Act as a senior commercial attorney. Review the [CONTRACT TYPE] below as a first-pass triage. Flag in numbered order: (1) clauses that are unusually one-sided against my client, (2) ambiguous language that could be exploited, (3) standard clauses that appear non-standard or missing, (4) liability or indemnity issues, (5) termination or renewal traps. For each flag, quote the exact language and explain the risk in 1–2 sentences. End with a "negotiation priority list" of the top 3 issues to push back on.
CONTRACT:
[PASTE]
Summarize this case opinion into a one-page brief covering: (1) procedural posture, (2) facts (3-5 bullets), (3) issue presented, (4) holding, (5) reasoning (3-5 bullets), (6) why it matters / what it stands for. Tone: clean, formal, no editorializing. Use only information present in the opinion.
OPINION:
[PASTE OR ATTACH]
Translate this legal explanation into a client-friendly email. Audience: an intelligent non-lawyer who is anxious about their case. Tone: warm, clear, direct. Avoid Latin, "wherein," "heretofore," and unnecessary hedging. Keep it under 200 words. End with one specific next step.
LEGAL EXPLANATION:
[PASTE]
I'll paste a batch of documents below. Act as a junior associate doing first-pass discovery review. For each document, identify: (1) document type, (2) date, (3) key parties named, (4) one-sentence summary, (5) potential relevance to [CASE THEORY/CLAIM], (6) confidentiality concerns (PII, attorney-client, work product). Output as a clean table. Flag items I should personally review.
DOCUMENTS:
[PASTE]
Draft a demand letter for [CLAIM TYPE] against [DEFENDANT]. Facts: [BULLET FACTS]. Damages sought: [AMOUNT/REMEDY]. Tone: firm, factual, professional. Structure: (1) introductory paragraph identifying parties and matter, (2) statement of facts, (3) legal basis (placeholder for me to fill in citations), (4) demand and deadline (14 days), (5) consequences of non-response, (6) closing. Do not invent case citations — leave bracketed placeholders for me to verify and fill.
Build a deposition outline for [WITNESS ROLE/IDENTIFIER] in a [CASE TYPE]. Theory of the case: [BRIEF THEORY]. Generate: (1) background and foundation questions (5–8), (2) substantive questions organized by topic (15–25, with sub-bullets for follow-ups), (3) key documents to authenticate, (4) impeachment areas if witness deviates, (5) closing questions. Use plain, conversational phrasing — no legalese in the questions themselves.
Act as a senior mediator. Given the facts and positions below, brainstorm 7–10 creative settlement structures that go beyond a single dollar number. Include: structured payouts, non-monetary terms (apologies, NDAs, future-conduct provisions), in-kind exchanges, and combinations. For each, note the upside and downside for both parties. Rank from "most likely to settle" to "longest shot."
CASE BACKGROUND:
[PASTE]
Generate a comprehensive intake question set for a [PRACTICE AREA] consultation. Goal: in 30 minutes, get enough information to (a) decide whether to take the case, (b) spot statute-of-limitations or jurisdictional issues, (c) identify key witnesses and documents, (d) understand the client's goals (not just legal remedies). Group questions into clear sections. Mark must-ask vs. follow-up. Avoid yes/no questions.
I'll describe my legal position below. Act as opposing counsel — find the 5 strongest counter-arguments to my position. For each, give the legal theory, the factual hook they'd use, and how I'd respond. Be aggressive — point out weaknesses I'm minimizing.
MY POSITION:
[PASTE]
Draft an engagement letter for a [PRACTICE AREA] matter. Include: scope of representation, fee structure ([HOURLY/FLAT/CONTINGENCY] at [RATE]), retainer requirement, billing cadence, communication expectations, file retention policy, conflict of interest disclosure, dispute resolution clause, termination terms, and signature lines. Plain English where possible. Keep under 1,200 words. Add comment placeholders for jurisdiction-specific provisions I need to add.